[mythtv] more mythweb updates

[Tako Schotanus]

It's your humble opinion and I humbly agree with it. I just thought it
was funny. But in reality its a very good example of the things that are
possible with the amount of interesting data that is "out there".

And you are absolutely right that the web interface should offer as much
of the functionality as the X interface.
Does this mean that the web interface itself will support plug-ins as
well? So a module author could include a web module to go with what he
has made?

And even though restricted by bandwidth I would still love to be able to
access the video streams over the internet, even if it wouldn't be
actually usable for viewing purposes it would still be useful to for
example check if the correct program had been recorded.

Cheers,
 -Tako

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mythtv-dev-bounces at snowman.net 
> [mailto:mythtv-dev-bounces at snowman.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Elliott
> Sent: dinsdag 1 juli 2003 10:56
> To: Development of mythtv
> Subject: Re: [mythtv] more mythweb updates
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:15:38AM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> > 
> > MythWeather? So we're going to get a web interface on some 
> data that is
> > retrieved from a website in the first place? Isn't that overkill?
> > 
> > You could just put the weatherchannel showing the correct 
> page inside a
> > frame.
> > 
> > Just kidding :-)
> 
> While I know you were just kidding, in response, I think the 
> primary goal
> of mythweb is to mimic the functionality of the base mythtv 
> applications on 
> the web front, is it not? I'm certain eventual goals include 
> video and music 
> streaming from the web interface. Sure, most residential internet
> connections aren't fast enough to stream video overf the internet, but
> that still leaves internal LAN/WANs in residences and offices
> who could benefit from it. And why not prepare for the future 
> growth of
> bandwidth (if not even help force the increase in faster bandwidth
> requirements for the net in general). 
> 
> I don't even use the mythweather functionality, but I think 
> it would be nice to
> include, even though it's just grabbing it from another website,
> because I love that integrated feel. One environment that has 
> the same feel
> because as UI design goes, that promotes reusability and content
> location expectations.
> 
> But that's just my humble opinion. :)
> 
> Kevin
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> mythtv-dev at snowman.net
> http://lists.snowman.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
>