[mythtv] 0.9 Road Map Sugestion

[Andy Davidoff]

It makes more sense to me to simply test the CVS more broadly during the
feature freeze preceding the release.  Call 'em release candidates if you
like; the point is that the issue here is testing, not change control.

I don't think it's unreasonable for developers to drop hard-core feature
additions in the week or two leading up to a release and concentrate on
fixing bugs.  If Myth had more developers and a more unstable CVS tree
in between releases, I'd agree that an unstable branch would be useful.


#if Robert Middleswarth /* Mar 20, 12:12 */
> I am not talking about a branch per say but more of after the next few 
> weeks before an major new unstable stuff gets added in but after more 
> people have had a change to user .8 and find the little bugs.  Example 
> under .8 the problem with setup under Pal. not having all the 
> resolutions avaible little things that get fixed in the first few weeks 
> after a release but before the really unstable stuff gets put into CVS.
#endif /* robert at middleswarth.net */