[mythtv] Trying to compile linux-2.6.10-DVB

[Ivor Hewitt]

On Monday 21 Feb 2005 07:14, Reg Clemens wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 Feb 2005 23:00, you wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 20 Feb 2005 07:35, clemens at dwf.com wrote:
> > > > > Im trying to compile linux-2.6.10-DVB, from the current CVS of
> > > > > dvb-kernel, but Im having problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > the routine or51211.c is looking for bt878.h, which exists, but
> > > > > obviously is not in its (include) path.
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone else seen this problem?
> > > > > I can fix it, but wonder how many other places Im going to have
> > > > > similar problems.
> > > >
> > > > Are you trying to compile out of tree? or by using makelinks and
> > > > building in the kernel tree?
> > > > I believe there is still a limitation that bt878 based cards require
> > > > building in tree.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Im trying to build using the makelinks thing from the kernel tree.
> > > Is that 'in tree' ?
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > Aha... I've just re-synced to latest CVS.... and:-
> >
> > drivers/media/dvb/frontends/or51211.h:27:19: bt878.h: No such file or
> > directory
> >
> > Must be a problem with latest dvb CVS/and or using it against 2.6.10.
> > Looks like it's the only one with the problem, so just patch it there and
> > report to linux-dvb at linuxtv.org.
> >
> > Regards,
>
> Actually its deeper than that.
> fixing the #include for bt878.h then uncovers a missing bt848.h.
> Fixing that uncovers a missing bttv.h
> and I didnt follow it any further.
>
> Im sure a simple addition to the Include path, or some additional
> lines from makeinclude would fix it a lot cleaner than trying to follow
> this thru (tho I guess I could remove this one *.c file and see if the
> disease goes any further...
>
> Mabe tomorrow...

Ah, but it's morning here now. :-) I'll have a rummage. As a temporary measure 
you could just exclude the building of the new or51211 driver... and having 
just re-read your message... must get coffee. must get coffee.

-- 
Ivor
http://www.ivor.it/goog - MSN Search unbiased?