[mythtv] 'stable' tag proposal
ijr at case.edu
Tue Mar 22 02:18:52 UTC 2005
On Monday 21 March 2005 09:16 pm, Frank Riley wrote:
> Isaac Richards wrote:
> > On Monday 21 March 2005 08:23 pm, andrew burke wrote:
> >>Look, it's common courtesy to bring up issues I have before I go and just
> >>fork the code. Forking a project can often cause lots of bad blood and
> >>problems. I do appreciate what all the devs have put together, I just
> >>think that things can be handled a bit differently to improve the
> >> end-user experience. I never said what the developers have done isn't
> >> worthwhile, but I do take issue with the way the project is being
> >> managed. I offered to help improve that situation numerous times, and
> >> the devs seem to have decided it isn't help they're interested in, and
> >> that's their choice. But personally, I know I would be upset if someone
> >> forked a project I started without at least raising the issues they had
> >> for doing so.
> > You have _not_ offered to help improve the situation. You've offered to
> > help move to subversion. That's not the same thing.
> > Are you now changing your offer?
> What Andrew is proposing would work just fine on CVS as well as subversion.
Of course is will (that's my whole point), but he's not offered to actually
_do_ anything before.
More information about the mythtv-dev