[mythtv] LIRC question
Calvin Harrigan
charriglists at bellsouth.net
Mon Oct 31 09:29:51 EST 2005
Hal Burch wrote:
>The remote control system seems a bit hackish, translating remote
>events to keypress events. Is this a conscience design, a result of
>the recent addition of native LIRC support, or the result of the Lirc
>library?
>
>It would seem better for the keybindings to natively support LIRC
>events (new column in keybinding). This would make patches like trac
>#549 unnecessary, and might allow for greater flexibility. I've fixed
>the remotekey-to-keypress mapping, and morphed my keybindings around
>to get the functionality mapping as much as reasonable. If I ever
>actually wanted to use my keyboard, it would be difficult.
>
>However, this may be considered a problem or there may be some more
>fundamental reason for the current Lirc => KeyPress => action string
>=> function call process I've seen in multiple places of which I am
>unaware.
>
> - Hal
>_______________________________________________
>mythtv-dev mailing list
>mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
>http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
>
>
>
I currently working on a little stand-alone app that will route lirc
events directly into the input handler of the kernel. That way I can
use a standard keyboard/even wireless and then map (via config file)
remote keyppresses to any key without having to remap the physical
keyboard.. The original intention was to allow me to use
more/additional programs without having to worry about lirc support.
I've always had trouble with lirc and focus anyways, now I'll let X
handle it.
Calvin...
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list