[mythtv] Questions about which components are meant for FE and BE

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:05:16PM -0500, Boleslaw Ciesielski wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>  > There are various reasons to keep packages granular or non-granular,
>  > space on fs is only one reason. The distinction into a frontend and a
>  > backend part seems to have served users for a long time now. If there
>  > are now frontless, backendless parts that make sense packaging
>  > differently it should be considered.
> 
> (trying to revive this older thread)
> 
> It seems that at least mythjobqueue, mythcommflag and mythtranscode can 
> be run anywhere so maybe they could be separated into separate package 
> or packages.

Any suggestion for a name? What are the dependencies, e.g. given a
set of sub-packages:

frontend
backend
setup
?
?
?

which should depend on which?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-dev/attachments/20061125/e7c3d035/attachment.pgp