[mythtv] MythBrowser with QT4
cardoe at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 21:09:00 UTC 2008
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Stuart Morgan <stuart at tase.co.uk> wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2008 10:42:43 Jochen Kühner Privat wrote:
> > What would be the suggested Solution for Mythbrowser, would it be better
> > KDE4 or qt is used for Mythbrowser? I think qt is the better solution,
> > because otherwise we have one lib more we need! What do the other people
> > think???
> QT would be best. I think Janne mentioned using qtwebkit but that requires
> 4.4 which isn't yet available.
> I think using KDE would be a real mistake, this is the perfect opportunity
> get away from that dependency.
As discussed in the #mythtv channel, using Qt 4.4 would be a great benefit
here due to including WebKit directly in QT. The best solution all around
for everyone would probably just say that mythbrowser is going to be a
feature dependent on Qt 4.4 since users will have a solid and well tested
mythbrowser implementation and all the work to port to KHTML 4.x will be
better spent on other parts of MythTV.
Gentoo Linux Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mythtv-dev