Has anyone seen a case where jitterometer claims to see a constant mix of interlaced and progressive frames? Many of my channels, which I would consider interlaced, show up in Myth's logs as:<br><br>2007-11-26 12:01:03.976
NVP: interlaced frame seen after 59 progressive frames<br>2007-11-26 12:01:03.976 Enabled deinterlacing<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.326 NVP: progressive frame seen after 11 interlaced frames<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.393 Disabled deinterlacing
<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.559 NVP: interlaced frame seen after 7 progressive frames<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.559 Enabled deinterlacing<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.726 NVP: progressive frame seen after 6 interlaced frames<br>2007-11-26 12:01:
04.793 Disabled deinterlacing<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.976 NVP: interlaced frame seen after 7 progressive frames<br>2007-11-26 12:01:04.976 Enabled deinterlacing<br>2007-11-26 12:01:05.326 NVP: progressive frame seen after 11 interlaced frames
<br>2007-11-26 12:01:05.393 Disabled deinterlacing<br>2007-11-26 12:01:05.493 NVP: interlaced frame seen after 5 progressive frames<br>2007-11-26 12:01:05.493 Enabled deinterlacing<br>2007-11-26 12:01:05.793 NVP: progressive frame seen after 11 interlaced frames
<br>2007-11-26 12:01:05.859 Disabled deinterlacing<br>...<br><br>Is such a thing practical? I'm certain it's possible to have mix of both but I can't imagine why anyone would want to do so. Is jitterometer correct here?
<br><br>- Mark.<br>