[mythtv-users] Idea for faster channel surfing
littlejohn86 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 3 00:49:33 UTC 2004
Noob question, but why is it necessary to have the buffer require a 2
second start time?
Why could it not just drop frames at a rate not easily noticed until
the buffer was full? That would solve the surfing problem in a
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:10:24 -0800, Brad Templeton
<brad+myth at templetons.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:30:50PM -0500, Michael Starks wrote:
> > I had an idea about how the delay might be reduced when changing
> > channels. In a 2+ tuner system, can one tuner "leapfrog" the other and
> > start buffering the next or previous channel, depending on the direction
> > the user is surfing?
> > For example, I start at channel three.
> > Tuner two starts buffering channel four.
> > I go to channel four and start reading the buffer.
> > Tuner 1 starts buffering channel five.
> Thought of this years ago and blogged it earlier on this year:
> But oddly, just reposted it yesterday in some other myth discussion
> areas. Something whose time has come -- if it weren't for the fact
> that part of "getting" a PVR is to realize that channel surfing
> is a silly idea.
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
More information about the mythtv-users