[mythtv-users] Best approach for TV output (composite/s-video)?
kuhn at razorsys.com
Thu Sep 23 09:49:38 EDT 2004
I think i've tried them all.. and have settled on the PVR-350 TV-out
first i tried a Avermedia Gold 3 scan converter.. this was horrible
dark.. blurry no amount of adjustment would make it work properly
I then purchased a PNY GF4mx this was much better but still too blurry
for me and it could not keep up with fast motion (ticker tape would jitter)
so then then decided to try the PVR-350 tv out.. was night and day
compared to the rest of the options.. picture was crisp and kept up with
the motion on the tv.. using the X driver for it also allows you to
watch video thru mythvideo just fine.. only draw backs is no hardware
acceleration for OpenGL parts of my (music/gallery) it deverts to
software which can be rather slow depending on your cpu..
Jeff_Mitchell at accessbusinessgroup.com wrote:
>I've been using Myth since about v0.7, and I think I'm finally on the verge
>of buying the equipment for a set-top box, so we can actually watch
>recorded shows on our TV. I saw the thread started by mladwig at comcast, but
>the TV in that thread accepts component inputs. Unfortunately, my TV will
>only accept s-video or composite inputs.
>I've seen people mention using NVidia cards with tv-out, and I've seen
>people using the PVR-350s. The set-top box I have in mind out has enough
>horsepower that it doesn't need the decoding capabilities of the PVR-350,
>but it might be worth it to go ahead and get it if the video quality is
>noticeably better than what I would get from an NVidia card. (I could
>always use another tuner anyway.)
>Given that we'd probably be using the box for TV, MythVideo, MythMusic, and
>MythGame (as well as some of the other modules -- those are the ones I can
>think that would be graphically intensive (including visualizations in
>MythMusic that might benefit from hardware acceleration)), does anyone have
>suggestions as to which way to go?
>Thanks for reading. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>P.S. I'm subscribed to the digest for this list. Does anyone know how I
>can reply to messages in this thread without creating a new top-level post?
>Or do I just need to change to non-digest mode?
>mythtv-users mailing list
>mythtv-users at mythtv.org
More information about the mythtv-users