[mythtv-users] Intel vs AMD for Myth - dual core....
mwahal at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 04:39:47 UTC 2005
The HD recording is already in mpeg2. If you get a decent nvidia
graphics card with component output (gt6200, gt6600, gt6800), then
most of the hardware processing can be offloaded to the graphics card.
The dual core will only help you in transcoding from mpeg2 to mpeg4.
My HD setup is HD3000, Sempron 3000+, 512MB DDR for backend.
For frontend, I've IOData AVeL Link Player 2.
On 6/23/05, Dave <dbadia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi -
> I've been using myth for quite a while for standard def, and
> starting to plan for an HD system.
> I've been reading the posts, and the general consensus seems to the
> that (single core) Intel processors have a performance advantage over
> AMDs. The benchmarks below seem to confirm this
> It looks like this may change with dual-core processors. The
> following benchmark compares 4 processors:
> AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (single core)
> Intel P4 660 (single core)
> AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (dual core)
> Pentium D840 (dual core)
> Judging from the benchmarks, it appears that AMD has a performance
> advantage over Intel once dual-core becomes mainstream (assuming that
> the encoding performance in these benchmarks will be roughly
> equivalent to MPEG-2 decoding performance)
> Guess we'll have to wait until some of us can get our hands on them to
> know for sure.
> Just thought I'd throw this out there.
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
More information about the mythtv-users