[mythtv-users] Intel vs AMD for Myth - dual core....
k.m.fort at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 05:22:36 UTC 2005
The geek in me say's Ooooh! The realist say's who needs all of that horse
power(I must be getting old, thinking about the days before the 1 GHz
barrier was broken).
From: mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org
[mailto:mythtv-users-bounces at mythtv.org] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:59 PM
To: Discussion about mythtv
Subject: [mythtv-users] Intel vs AMD for Myth - dual core....
I've been using myth for quite a while for standard def, and
starting to plan for an HD system.
I've been reading the posts, and the general consensus seems to the
that (single core) Intel processors have a performance advantage over
AMDs. The benchmarks below seem to confirm this
It looks like this may change with dual-core processors. The
following benchmark compares 4 processors:
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (single core)
Intel P4 660 (single core)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (dual core)
Pentium D840 (dual core)
Judging from the benchmarks, it appears that AMD has a performance
advantage over Intel once dual-core becomes mainstream (assuming that
the encoding performance in these benchmarks will be roughly
equivalent to MPEG-2 decoding performance)
Guess we'll have to wait until some of us can get our hands on them to
know for sure.
Just thought I'd throw this out there.
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users at mythtv.org
More information about the mythtv-users