[mythtv-users] QAM channels through my TV (but not my tuner)
R. G. Newbury
newbury at mandamus.org
Sun Dec 3 20:56:10 UTC 2006
Tom Lichti wrote:
> R. G. Newbury wrote:
>> Tom Lichti wrote:
>>> Isn't that kind of what I said, only with more words? :)
>> The short version elided the distinction between encoded and encrypted.
>> I'm a lawyer. I am shocked, appalled and dismayed that you would ever
>> think, believe or ascribe to the notion that I have been long-winded,
>> verbose or prolix. To the contrary, I am always and forever terse, short
>> and succinct!
> Right, I should have remembered that. :)
> Although, I don't think your distinction is valid, since all of the
> channels that Rogers puts on the wire digitally are encoded in qam256,
> only *some* of them are *also* encrypted. :P
Exactly. I can't find your original post but it implied (or I inferred
from it) that you believed that encrypted and encoded were distinctly
different delivery methodologies, whereas your last statement is the
truth of the matter.
More information about the mythtv-users