[mythtv-users] SMP Performance
spikeygg at gmail.com
Mon Dec 11 19:44:25 UTC 2006
On 12/11/06, Brian Wood <beww at beww.org> wrote:
> Shouldn't that be "alluded to" ? I'm not trying to escape anything :-)
Yeah! that's the right word. Thanks for the correction, I've been using it
wrong for a long time. :(
> You have to look at the core type, as as well as the cache size. I also
> think that the Opterons don't support PowerNow, which might be important to
> somebody trying to build a quiet machine.
I do like the cpudyn, I have it running on my Athlon64: 1000MHz unless
I'm using the machine or doing something in the background. :)
> Most Opterons are Socket 940, to allow for multiple CPUs on one
> motherboard (it's more complex than that but you get the idea I hope). The
> 165 is described as a "single CPU solution", hence the 939-pin socket.
> Most socket 940 mobos are designed for servers and thus have things like
> 64-bit PCI slots for RAID cards, SCSI controllers and sometimes very basic
> graphics (who needs fast graphics on a server?).
> The 939-pin Opterons are sort of a mixed breed, but can be useful for some
I just wonder how a single Opteron compares to an Athlon64 of the same
frequency when running X, myth, transcode jobs, etc. According to MSI's
website my motherboard can take either of the 939-pin breeds. When
I upgrade my processor, I'd like to get the one more suited to the job I
need. Basically, I wish I knew which one would be better for our
application. I have yet to hear someone point to one processor as the one
for a myth machine.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mythtv-users