[mythtv-users] 5200 or 6200
Rich.West at wesmo.com
Tue Jan 23 20:50:55 UTC 2007
Tom Lichti wrote:
> Nick Morrott wrote:
>> On 23/01/07, Damian Surr <damian at gingermagic.com> wrote:
>>> Does MythTV prefer 5200 or 6200 for any reason?
>> The 5xxx series of cards do not have the black and white OSD problems
>> that the 6xxx and 7xxx series cards have, due to a change in the way
>> chroma-keying is handled (see
>> for more infor).
>> A 5200 card with 128MB, TV-out and DVI would be my choice - many US
>> users use the 5200 for HDTV output in addition to SDTV, using the XvMC
>> support in the nVidia driver. There's no benefit in getting 256MB
>> unless you are also going to use the machine for heavy gaming. OpenGL
>> support allows you also to use the new OpenGL-enabled menus in the
> I had a 5200, but moved to a 6200 because it came with a component out
> dongle, which works much better than the setup I had before. No issues
> with the 5200 though, just didn't have component out. I have the 5200 in
> another frontend now.
I am so glad someone else asked this question. I cobbled together the
video cards on two of my FE's
by stealing a fan-driven 5200 from my kids machine and the fan-driven
PNY 6200 (with component out) from my machine.
Now that the machines are all up and we're pretty much completely
switched over to a whole-house MythTV setup, I was looking in to getting
all fanless cards. Alas, I got stuck in the same position of "which
should I get? The 5200 or 6200?"
I've noticed that the 5200's are much harder to find now-a-days.
Fanless 6200's aren't all that difficult to find, but tend to run about
50% more in price than 5200's. Also, finding an affordable fanless 6200
agp with component out has so far been next to impossible. :(
And, yes, I have seen the black-n-white problem with the 6200 when using
XvMC. I haven't gotten around to trying XvMC again since then, though..
More information about the mythtv-users