[mythtv-users] Hauppauge HD-PVR: Photos and link to pre-order
Brad DerManouelian
myth at dermanouelian.com
Mon Apr 7 18:31:36 UTC 2008
Steven Adeff wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Brad DerManouelian
> <myth at dermanouelian.com> wrote:
>> Steven Adeff wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Steve Peters - Priority Electronics
>> > <steve at priorityelectronics.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> Then when it wants to record, a channel change script you set up
>> >> >>> that tells the device "I want channel 207."
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> What would be really nice if if you could tell the hd-pvr somehow whether to
>> >> record in 480p, 720p or 1080i. Even better would be if it could figure it
>> >> out for you. But I think that part might not happen seeing that it's analog.
>> >>
>> >> -Steve
>> >
>> > I don't see why it wouldn't be able to do this, a TV can detect what
>> > the signal is this should be able to do the same and encode the signal
>> > digitally at the proper resolution instead of "converting" it to
>> > something else.
>>
>> It does 1080i or 720p.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > What *would* be cool is if it could convert interlaced to progressive
>> > in hardware before encoding so 1080i signals would encode as 1080p....
>>
>> Because you want to trust someone else to decide which deinterlacer is
>> best for your needs? ok....
>
> Ah, who says you wouldn't be able to pass an encoding option to tell
> it what type of deinterlacer to use? Plus, for 1080i you'll pretty
> much always want to use a IVTC, followed by a smart frame deinterlacer
> (which will 99% of the time not have any work to do if the original
> telecine is properly done). For 480i material a simple smart frame
> deinterlacer should be more than sufficient. If you pay attention to
> the doom9 forums you'll see they have a few "favorite" deinterlacing
> methods they use, all of which can easily be implemented by a DSP and
> the firmware and then selectable by the user.
I still prefer to leave the deinterlacing up to the person viewing it
and not be confined to hardware limitations. I used to think Linear was
ok until I started using Yadif. It would suck to not have that option
now when the next best deinterlacer comes out.
>
>> > What would also be cool is a dual encoder version (ala PVR-500)....
>> >
>>
>> Buy two. ;)
>
> haha, touche. but seriously.... extra power, extra shelf space, etc.
> The HD-Homerun could have been a single tuner device too with the "buy
> two" option. even the PVR-500 did not have to exist. But why not lower
> the footprint and include two devices in one box, sharing one power
> supply, one USB cable, etc.
Maybe one day. For now, I'm buying 1. If it works out, I'll buy another.
I look forward to getting all my capture cards out of my mythtv box and
moving to a MUCH smaller form-factor frontend/backend box.
-Brad
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list