[mythtv-users] seeking video hardware recommendations
Richard Bronosky
BrunosJunk at Bronosky.com
Thu Feb 28 01:48:31 UTC 2008
I'm very sad to hear that utilization of the gpu for video playback
has improved in 2.5 years. I really look forward to the day when
desktop Linux is a strong competitor, but right now all the attention
seems to be going into Linux as a server. Don't get me wrong. I'm an
engineer and I make a very good living exclusively in OSS. It's just
sad that I can do the impossible with a server in a data center that I
have never seen, but give it a GUI an put me in the same room with it
and I don't know what to do.
Also I guess I should have mentioned that I have no intention of doing
anything 3D, or workstation-ish with it. It will only be a MythTV
frontend, and web browser. (If the hardware were somehow incapable of
running microsoft products, that would please me.) Unfortunately it
doesn't go without saying, I need DVI output. I don't know why they
are still putting VGA ports on things. With DVI (DVI-I) you are just
a cable away from being able to drive any display.
Thanks for the advice. Even though you feel confident that playing
MPEG2 isn't a problem, I know that my old machine can't handle HD.
Also I hear that PCI video cards can't handle HD. Not that I'd buy a
PCI video card.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Sarah Hayes
<sarah at sarahhayes.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> Richard Bronosky wrote:
> > It's time to bury this system http://www.bronosky.com/?p=21 And one
> > thing I learned from my first MythTV build is that I should start with
> > reliable video hardware support and build backwards. I'm going to
> > separate the FE and BE this time to optimize the playback experience.
> > Here is what I am thinking.
> >
> > 1. I'd prefer low power consumption. (which adds the side benefits of
> > low heat and low noise)
> > 2. I'd like to use VIA cpu, but I am not dead-set on it.
> >
> Keep in mind the VIA cpu's aren't the most potent of processors. Also
> keep in mind that the mini-ITX boards that aren't passive cooled, will
> come with 40mm fans. They work but can whine in an annoying manner.
> For what they bring to the table, they're kind of expensive IMHO.
>
> > 3. It must be able to playback HD from an HDHomeRun (MPEG2 TS)
> >
> Can't comment, I'm a limey, but mpeg2 is will within the capabilities of
> any processor on the market I'd say.
>
> > 4. It must be able to output an industry standard 720p and 1080i
> > signal so my HDTV will "just work" like it does with my $40 upsampling
> > DVD player
> >
> Go for it's VGA/DVI interface and let the Xorg configuration pull the
> right settings in, shouldn't be a problem.
>
> > The options seem to be (in order of my preference):
> > 1. Unichrome video hardware that is present on many VIA mini-mobos
> >
> Nice. Royal pain though. Official drivers are hit n' miss, OpenChrome
> support hit n' miss by all accounts. Just because it says it can
> accelerate X don't mean it'll be able to outside of Windows. Lots of
> potential but very 'meh' IMHO.
>
> > 2. Intel video hardware that is present on many "on-board video" configurations
> >
> Currently not much cop, but with all the documentation now 'out there'
> their should be a marked improvement in hardware decoding speed right
> around the corner.
>
> > 3. nVidia who does seem to be show must OSS-love lately
> >
> Loverly for 3D work. Seems to be some oddities about XvMC and certain
> revisions of card + drivers. But, if I was buying right now, for a
> workstation. It would be an Nvidia I'd get
>
> > 4. ATI who has traditionally been an OSS nightmare.
> >
> Similar situation to Intel really. AMD have pushed out pretty much all
> the documentation for certain revisions of GPU, expect the OSS drivers
> to come on in leaps and bounds within 6/12 months.
>
> > Keep in mind that I haven't thought about hardware since August of
> > 2005. I'm sure a lot has changed.
> >
> Not so much really, CPU's are faster, disks bigger, PCI-E is replacing
> all the damn PCI slots on mobos... you can get passive coolers for
> that Althon XP you've got, need a big case though.
>
> > After I decide on video, I will then choose a mobo with optical (maybe
> > coax) audio. I am going to research the viability of CF storage for
> > an FE only system. Then I will figure out how much ram I need to make
> > sure I never swap.
> >
> I can 'just' get away with 256MB on the EPIA MII10K, just. 512MB would
> be better. Considering some of the IGP solutions can take upwards of
> 200MB these days I'd suggest just dumping 1GB in the box, RAM, even
> DDR2, is cheap.
>
> Before plunking the cash for the mobo, double check via google that you
> can make use of the audio hardware on board.
>
> > What do you think? (Mainly about the video hardware.)
> >
> >
> Considering Myth doesn't do anything with GFX (for the most part) and it
> takes bugger all effort for a GPU to playback video; I'd go with either
> an Intel or Via IGP solution, they're not "brilliant" but "good enough"
> for Myth.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>
--
.!# RichardBronosky #!.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list