[mythtv-users] `Mythbackend leaks memory` continued
Udo van den Heuvel
udovdh at xs4all.nl
Sun Jun 29 05:11:17 UTC 2008
Ray Lischner wrote:
> An increase by 10% in virtual memory size is not significant. Keep
> running and observing. That may be the first indication of a leak, but
> it's too soon to tell.
%CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME
7.2 9.1 393468 88688 ? Ssl 16:34 4:27
5.2 11.8 443152 115084 ? Ssl Jun23 39:17
5.7 12.6 451428 122892 ? Ssl Jun23 126:25
5.8 13.6 461224 132536 ? Ssl Jun23 213:50
5.9 14.8 473084 143824 ? Ssl Jun23 300:29
6.0 16.0 485440 156256 ? Ssl Jun23 391:59
5.9 17.0 495228 165496 ? Ssl Jun23 475:35
A bit sooner than planned but these results already give some trend
info. Memory related ficgures only go up after the first set of numbers.
Interestingly the CPU doesn't appear to be stable after the first sample
(which was not at the same time of day as the others).
The CPU-time per day (see TIME collumn) isn't a steady increasing number.
What do we see here? Do you need a graph?
Udo
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list