[mythtv-users] a better tuner for SD

Brett Kosinski fancypantalons at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 19:14:26 UTC 2008


>>> Interesting, I hadn't heard about this.  I have a pair of PVR-150's
>>> and have been pretty happy with them, overall.  What differences have
>>> you observed between the 150 and 250?
>>
>> I got some interference with my 150 and the audio seemed better on my
>> 350. Also, I often got the tinny audio problem on the 150 which never
>> happened on the 350. There were also lots of reports of bad
>> experiences with the 150 because they switched chipsets at some point.
>>
>> That said, I know that the power supply can greatly affect the quality
>> of the PVR-*50/500 (and probably many analog cards) as well as which
>> PCI slot it is in. Maybe advice to the OP should be to swap out for a
>> better power supply and see if that helps things.
>
> Remember the difference between the "tuner" and the "encoder". A PVR is
> both on one card.
>
> Using an external tuner, and going into the PVR as baseband (composite
> or S-Video), has been said to produce an improvement by some folks.
>
> The PVR tuners (and MANY different ones were used by Hauppauge) seem to
> be sensitive to input levels.
>
> The PVR encoder has a lot of tweaks which may help on that end of the
> equation:
>
> http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/V4l2-ctl

Ahh, interesting... I've never actually used my PVR-150s as tuners,
instead feeding them with Svideo  from a pair of external settop
boxes.  That may explain why, in general, I've been pretty happy with
the audio and video quality I've gotten from them.

Brett.


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list