[mythtv-users] Linux wall wart pulls 5 watts - could make a great master backend
Michael T. Dean
mtdean at thirdcontact.com
Wed Feb 25 17:57:19 UTC 2009
On 02/24/2009 08:28 PM, Brad Templeton wrote:
> Tunerless slave backends work fine, I use them for transcode jobs etc.
I still have to wonder what benefit that specific configuration
provides... I can see how a tunerless master backend could be useful
for power saving/running in a VM on an always-on machine, but for a
remote backend, it becomes a mythjobqueue server--the only difference
being that by running mythbackend instead of mythjobqueue, you're a)
running an unsupported configuration that may fail at any time (even
without any version updates or whatever) and b) you're wasting a lot of
memory that would be /far/ more useful for the actual
transcoding/commflagging jobs it's running...
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/347829#347829
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/365270#365270
At least until the tunerless backend is supported, why not do it the
right way and run mythjobqueue?
Mike
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list