[mythtv-users] Cheap Video Card
raymond at wagnerrp.com
Sat Dec 11 21:21:01 UTC 2010
On 12/11/2010 16:02, Brian Wood wrote:
> On Saturday, December 11, 2010 12:58:12 pm Raymond Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/10/2010 13:55, Steven Adeff wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Brian Wood<beww at beww.org> wrote:
>>>> OK, it does have a fan, but:
>>>> According to the WiKi this is a feature set "C" card. It will fit
>>>> in a case requiring a low profile card, if you supply your own
>>>> Much as I HATE rebates, it does appear to be a good deal (assuming
>>>> the rebate materializes).
>>> if the rebate is through tiger direct, run like the hills. if it's
>>> through EVGA it shouldn't be so bad, I've done 2 or 3 rebates
>>> through them and they've all come within the 6-8week window.
>>> that said, this is a GT210, which is not worth purchasing for Myth,
>>> if I remember correctly, it's not fast enough to properly decode
>>> higher bitrate stuff. you'll want a GT220 or GT4xx series card.
>>> I've got a few GT220's in service, one in my theater room machine
>>> and one in my parent's, and they work great.
>> The video decoders in the GT210, GT220, and GT430 cards are _exactly_
>> the same. They all support "feature set C". They all support
>> decoding of the same codecs. They all support the same improved
>> scalars from previous cards. They all handle the same bitrates and
>> resolutions. The difference is the GT210 is not a sufficiently
>> powerful card to run the Advanced 2X deinterlace filter on 1080i60
>> content. That has nothing to do with the video decoder, as
>> deinterlacing is performed in shader code on the actual graphics
> So it's the same situation as an ION (9400m)?
> In spite of the de-interlacing limitation I've been very pleased with my
> Revo 1600, does this mean I could expect similar performance with the
The 9400m and GT218m in the ION and ION2, respectively, are similarly
limited. They are not capable of that top end filter at 1080i60.
More information about the mythtv-users