[mythtv-users] [mythtv] BrowserBased setup
robert.mcnamara at gmail.com
Wed Nov 24 21:50:45 UTC 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Brian Wood <beww at beww.org> wrote:
>> Please. Pretty please.
> Sorry if it's the wrong place, but I thought this was the place for
> users to discuss problems and issues they have *from the user's
> perspective*. That's why there is a user's list separate from the dev
> list, or so I thought.
Heh, you are right-- gmail threaded the two together so for me, it
still shows as on the dev list. Mea culpa.
> The idea is not fully formed enough to warrant an official "feature
> request", I just wanted to see if I was the only one for whom this is an
> issue, and if there might be reasons why it's not practical or desirable
> to implement.
Well, we don't really take feature requests regardless of the
formedness, so that's not too big of an issue. It would help if
people let us actually get somewhere with the setup rewrite, though,
as we are finally starting to get worked out exactly how to fit the
pieces together, and moreover, how to apportion and manage the
workload. A lot of the discussion in this thread is between users,
and that's fine, but understand that we have a pretty clear idea of
what we want, what we're doing and while some of us are probably happy
to clarify things, that we're not really soliciting input on how it
should work at this time. We're just barely getting to the tenuous
point where we're on the same page about it, and although this might
not make a lot of sense from a user perspective, we need to get some
of this work done "while the iron is hot" if we're to succeed at it.
I don't think we're looking to go back to the drawing board on this
topic right now, or it risks not happening at all.
> From the initial posting to this list, it appeared that this discussion
> had been intentionally steered to this list. Am I wrong in that?
You are correct, see above.
More information about the mythtv-users