[mythtv-users] TV Tuners in MythTV for Windows

Chris Adams rocket at extremelan.net
Mon Sep 6 06:22:17 UTC 2010


On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Raymond Wagner <raymond at wagnerrp.com> wrote:
>  On 9/6/2010 01:26, Robert Johnston wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 23:12, Raymond Wagner<raymond at wagnerrp.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 9/6/2010 00:30, Overlord wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking to make an htpc using xbmc and mythbox
>>>>
>>> Please reconsider this.  The 'mythbox' scripts ignore the database schema
>>> versioning, and XBMC bypasses the backend protocol checks.
>>
>> XBMC's built-in support uses the (well maintained) libcmyth library as
>> a base, doing what it can to use version-specific calls to myth's
>> ever-changing interface, and conforming to the Myth backend protocol
>> as much as possible, even going so far as to maintain a whole slew of
>> protocol options to remain compatible with older backend protocols.
>
> The last protocol update libcmyth got was for revision 44 almost a year and
> a half ago.  That means it has not been maintained since before the 0.22
> release.  Since then, there have been changes to the current protocol that
> will break it.  The fact that it sets no upper bounds, and will happily
> connect to any future version of mythbackend, is a very dangerous thing.
>
> The same goes for the raw database access it and 'mythbox' performs with no
> checks on database schemas.

Sam, check out mythbox, it's been given compatibility with protocol 57
(and there's a patch in their queue for 58) - which suggests it's been
tested and it works!

Besides - if Sam uses mythweb for scheduling mythbox only reads from
the database.

Good luck Sam - but I suspect you'll be more welcome on the xbmc
forums. Nothing to do with me, just that some people here don't like
the idea of xbmc talking to myth.


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list