[mythtv-users] Question re: available SATA ports and linux software RAID
myth at robinhill.me.uk
Fri Apr 8 08:05:24 UTC 2011
On Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 08:05:18 +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
> As to sizes, this is an easy one to get caught by - and some hardware
> RAID controllers really don't help by only allowing you to use the
> whole disk. If you replace a disk, then the new disk must be NO
> SMALLER AT ALL than the smallest disk in the set (or allow you to
> create a partition which is no smaller than the smallest partition
> used in the set).
> I have been caught by this in the past - drive fails in server, call
> up support company and they send out a new drive, but it won't work.
> Spend several days explaining to several different people that "yes
> it's a 9G drive, but it's smaller than the 9G drive that's failed,
> the replacement needs to be no smaller than <x> blocks". IIRC it took
> them about a week to source a replacement that wasn't slightly
> smaller - which was a "slightly worrying" time as there were errors
> starting to appear on several other drives and I think we ended up
> replacing about 4 before we'd done. I think we started doing mid-day
> backups of the data during that time as this server basically
> supported everything the company did (accounts, sales order
> processing, stock control, goods in, manufacturing processing, etc,
> etc, etc).
Fortunately this isn't a problem any more - all recent drives (I can't
remember exactly when they started - somewhere in the 250-500GB range I
think) use standard sizes across all manufacturers, so any 2TB drive
will serve as a replacement for any other.
( ' } | Robin Hill <myth at robinhill.me.uk> |
/ / ) | Little Jim says .... |
// !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20110408/1195efc5/attachment.bin
More information about the mythtv-users