[mythtv-users] Using Gentoo ebuilds from git packaging repo
gravityhammer at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 17:17:14 UTC 2011
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Robert Longbottom
<rongblor at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 11/02/2011 17:01, David Liana wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, lists.md301 <lists.md301 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:lists.md301 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Raymond Wagner
>> <raymond at wagnerrp.com <mailto:raymond at wagnerrp.com>> wrote:
>> On 2/10/2011 20:51, Robin Gilks wrote:
>> Does anyone have a howto on using the ebuilds from git? I
>> have read the
>> README file and have got the packages repository into
>> /usr/local/mythtv_portage and got as far as a --pretend on
>> the emerge and
>> it all looks OK.
>> Check out the packaging repository to your hard drive.
>> git clone git://github.com/MythTV/packaging.git
>> <http://github.com/MythTV/packaging.git> /usr/local/mythtv_portage
>> Add the overlay to portage with the following line in your
>> Then just continue to update MythTV and the plugins as normal.
>> 0.24 builds are marked as stable, while 0.25 builds will have
>> to be unmasked in your /etc/portage/package.keywords. Rob Smith
>> has been updating the ebuilds every few days, and you can pull
>> the new sets by running the following.
>> So is this going to be the "official" manner in which mythtv is
>> going to be supported in Gentoo going forward? Perhaps the
>> transition to git has thrown a monkeywrench into things, but I
>> haven't seen much official action in Gentoo-land for 0.24, either in
>> portage (no alpha ebuilds) or on the bugs tracking. On the open
>> Gentoo bugs ticket requesting a 0.24 ebuild, I see that people have
>> been offering their own ebuilds (and referencing the mythtv git ones
>> as well), but nothing from the official gentoo maintainer "cardoe"
>> (Doug Goldstein), or any timeline.
>> I've been waiting to try 0.24 on my system, but don't know if I
>> should wait for something to appear in portage, or go with the
>> mythtv-bundled solution. I want to avoid having to switch
>> approaches mid-stream if possible. If/when something is decided, it
>> would be nice for it to be published someplace (wiki, mailing list,
>> I don't know if it will be going forward, as I don't speak for Gentoo or
>> MythTV. But, the ebuilds work well and users can generate their own
>> ebuilds using the provided python script.
>> The upgrade was generally painless for me.
> I waited for (what felt like) ages for 0.24 ebuilds to appear in portage,
> and eventually got bored of waiting. The upgrade to the mythtv packaging
> ebuilds was fairly painless and they seem to be following 0.24-fixes pretty
> closely and even if they don't it seems to be quite easy to generate your
> own, which is good.
I'm about to go through the same update process. According to the
directions, you need to set the SVN revision in your make.conf file.
Is there a list of acceptable SVN revision numbers that are available
to the ebuild?
More information about the mythtv-users