[mythtv-users] 1 FE and 2 separate BE-FE

Mike McMullin mwmcmlln at mnsi.net
Mon Jan 24 02:38:51 UTC 2011


On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 11:14 -0500, Raymond Wagner wrote:
> On 1/23/2011 09:00, rawgarlic at gmail.com wrote:
> > Because in this arrangement we have 2 complete backend-frontend
> > systems X and Y in rooms 1 and 2.
> > We don't need to setup a complete 3rd system.
> > We just need to be able to watch any available content from X or Y at
> > any given time, in room 3.
> 
> Why not make X a master backend with frontend, and Y a slave backend 
> with frontend?  Is there any reason you need to have two independent 
> systems, rather than tying them together so they share tuners and 
> recordings?

  Showing my ignorance of how complex mythtv is here, can the slave
backend not have it's own tuners, access the master database, and master
storage directory structure?



More information about the mythtv-users mailing list