[mythtv-users] hardware considerations: fast CPU vs nvidia/vdpau?
jlong at jasonlong.com
Sun Jul 17 19:07:15 UTC 2011
I've been happy using zotac atom/ion boards for FE with vdpau... Handles
1080p and 5.1 audio fine. Only ~15 watts idle, mini-itx, quiet, USB
thumb drive for the OS, or a SSD. My backend has quad core for
transcoding and commercial flagging and a redundant storage array for
the data, so it uses up quite a bit more power.
On 7/17/11 11:22 AM, Matt Garman wrote:
> My current combined Myth FE+BE is using an AMD X2 250 processor, AMD
> 760G chipset, and an nvidia geforce 210 video card. I have no
> performance problems. However, this system uses a fair amount of
> power (50+ Watts at idle). I know 50 Watts isn't that much, but
> I've recently built two Intel Sandy Bridge systems (using the
> integrated graphics): a micro-ATX system for myself that uses about
> 30 Watts at idle, and a mini-ITX system for my dad that uses about
> 25 Watts at idle. Both of these Sandy Bridge systems are quad core
> as well.
> Anyway, I don't have a link handy, but a few months ago I read on
> this list that mythtv has really been designed around CPU-based
> decoding; things like vdpau, while great (and working well for most
> people, including me), are not really part of the "core" mythtv
> design paradigm. That's a loose paraphrasing, but hopefully I'm
> conveying the right idea. If nothing else, it is one extra thing to
> set up.
> What I'm trying to get to is the simplest possible setup (i.e.
> minimal configuration) that does what I want. So my current thought
> is to build a new Sandy Bridge-based system, using the built-in
> Intel graphics and letting the CPU do all the decoding,
> deinterlacing, etc. Dumping my current AMD CPU + nVidia video card
> in favor of Intel Sandy Bridge gets me all these features:
> - Mini-ITX (I know it can be done with AMD, but Intel is
> currently better for power consumption). Mini-ITX gets me a
> smaller machine overall.
> - Lower power consumption (I've seen mini-ITX SB builds on the
> web that use 14 Watts at idle).
> - Simpler configuration (no proprietary Nvidia drivers, no AMD
> video driver headaches, no vdpau configuration, etc). To be
> fair, I've never used Intel graphics on Linux, so maybe they
> come with their own set of headaches?
> Anyway, assuming the Intel graphics are relatively easy to get
> working correctly under Linux (I plan on using CentOS 6.0), is there
> any downside to my plan? I.e., is there any reason I *want* to keep
> the nvidia/vdpau setup?
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
More information about the mythtv-users