[mythtv-users] Mythbackend Service not starting up after 0.25 upgrade

[Zarthan South]

>
>
>>> It is less confusing to everyone if you just XXX out the middle two
>> octets as in 192.XXX.XXX.15
>>
>
> I don't see any reason to obscure a NATed IP address.  Does this present
> some sort of vulnerability or risk?
>
>
While an internal NATed address isn't a vulnerability in itself it is a
piece of information that can be used when mounting an attack. If you
always use the XXX to block out a NATed address you won't forget when you
post that type information from work where it can be used. The poster
obviously wanted to conceal their address hence my suggestion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20120417/c0591d5b/attachment.html>