[mythtv-users] Temporal 2x vs Temporal-Spatial 2x
mythtv at rtr.ca
Wed Feb 8 21:00:22 UTC 2012
On 12-02-08 01:44 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 17:58, Mark Lord <mythtv at rtr.ca> wrote:
>> MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 65 fields/s
> And this value is the one that concerns some. It is,
> on average, just barely good enough (in the US,
> which needs 60 for Advanced 2x). On a particular
> set of frames, there is the belief that it might not
> be able to keep up, producing an occasional
> "stutter" that is so annoying to some.
Yeah, exactly. I'd have a hard time recommending that card (GT520) because of it.
Mind you, it's not far off from an Atom/Ion2 there, and those work rather well
on nearly all content.
Here, my card of choice was the fanless GT240, until I needed the extra PCIe slot,
and then replaced it with the fanless GT430 -- currently the best all-rounder
More information about the mythtv-users