[mythtv-users] FCC proposal

Steven Adeff adeffs.mythtv at gmail.com
Thu Feb 9 19:07:50 UTC 2012


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/let-1000-boxees-bloom-fighting-big-cables-encryption-initiative.ars?src=fbk

link to the FCC pdf:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021738292

Let 1,000 Boxees bloom: fighting Big Cable's encryption initiative
It is war between the National Cable and Telecommunications
Association and Boxee over a Federal Communications Commission
proposal that would allow cable companies to encrypt or scramble their
"basic tier" streams on all-digital systems. Time Warner Cable and
Comcast say go for it. But Boxee is calling for a time-out on the
idea.

Up until now, basic tier consumers have not needed de-scrambling
set-top boxes to connect to basic tier (which usually just offer the
over-the-air channels), the company's latest blog post warns. Big
cable's real motivation in pushing this rule "is to prevent you from
being able to connect the cable from the wall directly to your TV or
Boxee Box. You will need to rent a set-top box from your cable
provider, pay an extra $5-15 per month and it will no longer work with
your Boxee Box or similar devices."

Boxee markets a gadget that allows consumers to watch both cable and
Internet TV via that interface, and a hefty percentage of its
customers depend on that nonencrypted stream to make the system work.
In fact, Boxee has told the FCC that 40 percent of its device buyers
connect to cable via a "clear QAM" [unencrypted quadrature amplitude
modulation] signal.

"We estimate millions of consumers will see their TVs go dark," Boxee warns.
TP on board

Baloney, replies the NCTA, disputing Boxee's numbers and faulting the
company for not integrating CableCARD access in its machines. "Boxee
makes the astounding claim that basic tier encryption will have no
consumer benefits, ignoring the substantial record evidence to the
contrary—including the fact that encryption will free cable customers
from having to wait at home for a service visit when connecting or
disconnecting service."

The filing notes that straight-to-the-wall connections usually involve
a technician visit to make sure the connection is secure. "Once the
basic tier is encrypted, the opportunity for truckless installation
and/or disconnection becomes available to all customers, not just
basic tier customers."

To which Boxee has choice words: "Considering this ruling would also
mean millions more set top boxes and cable cards are manufactured,
distributed, and attached to electric outlets... their argument
doesn't hold water. It's akin to a cable executive taking a private
jet to an FCC meeting, but insisting on having recycled toilet paper
on-board to help save the environment."
In the clear

Here's some background on how this little love fest began. In 1992,
concerned about compatibility issues between various kinds of
television sets and cable signals, Congress gave the FCC authority to
require that cable companies offer basic tier on an unencrypted basis.
But last October the Commission launched a proceeding suggesting that
this provision be put to rest.

About 77 percent of cable subscribers have at least one digital cable
set-top box or retail CableCARD device in their home, the agency
noted. Various cable providers have received waivers from basic tier
encryption over the years, most prominently Cablevision in New York
City, and this has saved money via the decline in home visits.

The evidence thus shows, the FCC tentatively concluded, that:

    where cable operators undertake appropriate consumer protection
measures, the costs of retaining this rule (e.g., the need to schedule
service appointments whenever a consumer subscribes to or cancels
cable service as well as the expense and effect of cable operators'
trucks on traffic and the environment) outweigh the benefits of
retaining it (e.g., ensuring the continued utility of devices with
clear-QAM tuners).

Concurrent action

The Boxee bottom line on this issue goes as so—total encryption of
basic tier cable would deny consumers "innovative alternatives to
traditional pay TV that rely on QAM compatibility, while increasing
STB rental charges, energy costs, and dependency on MVPDs [multi-video
program distributors]."

So the FCC shouldn't go the route "without taking concurrent action to
increase compatibility of consumer devices with MVPD programming and
ensure alternative means of access by non-MVPD devices to broadcast
channel and public access programming."

The "concurrent action" that various advocacy groups want is AllVid,
the FCC's proposal for a mandated industry-wide gadget that you could
plug into your broadband router and connect to your cable TV provider,
then watch online video and pay channels through a variety of
AllVid-friendly devices. In a sense, Boxee is just that. What reform
groups like Public Knowledge and the Media Access Project want the FCC
to do is create an environment in which 1,000 Boxees could bloom.
They're disappointed that after almost two years, the agency hasn't
acted on the proposal.
Don't thwart the future

As for the de-encryption idea, both groups mostly support it, with
some modifications. The FCC proposes that cable operators going this
route (and almost all of them will) offer existing subscribers who
have a basic-service non-set-top-box powered television the gear
needed to descramble basic tier on one set without charge for a year.
Subscribers who receive Medicaid would get the equipment needed to
descramble basic tier on two sets without charge for five years from
the date of encryption.

Both Public Knowledge and Media Access suggest the Lifeline/Linkup
discount phone service program be added to the eligibility list. They
also want the FCC's Final Order to make sure that consumers are given
advance notice when their de-encryption period ends.

As for Boxee's protest, in a blog post, PK's John Bergmayer says he
sympathizes with the company. "The Boxee Box is an early vision of the
kind of next-generation video device that's needed to push the TV
industry forward," he notes. "It's come from a private company, not
one that has cut special deals with cable systems in every town," and
provides features that set-top boxes don't offer.

"It would be perverse if the FCC actively thwarted this and similar
devices," Bergmayer's commentary concludes.


-- 
Steve
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/User:Steveadeff
Before you ask, read the FAQ!
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
then search the Wiki, and this list,
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/
Mailinglist etiquette - http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Mailing_List_etiquette


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list