[mythtv-users] My so far 0.26 expierience

Steven Adeff adeffs.mythtv at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 15:00:21 UTC 2012


On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:40 AM, warpme <warpme at o2.pl> wrote:
> Hi *
>
> As 0.26 seems to be released, I want to share with You my over month of
> experience with 0.26.
> My sys is quite standard: headless BE + 3 ION1 diskless FE + 2xOSX FE
> BE in on AMD880G with E235 CPU (2x2,6G, 35W), 4G RAM, 2TB WD green for
> OS/DB/Movies, 3TB WD Green for recordings, 4xDVB-S2 tuners on Unicable,
> 1xDVB-T.
>
> Upgrade:
> I upgraded from highly stable 0.25.2. Compiling BE was snap. With FE I had
> glitch related to cross-building zeromq (I'm building 64bit FE image on
> 32bit host). Adding compiler -fPIC option solves issue.
> Upgrade went without any problem - only thing worth to mention that DB
> upgrade is loooong (mine took 10min or so).
> Generally - after packages preparation I was up & running within 10min.
> Polishing took 2-3 evenings (i.e. there was change in xml status date format
> so I have to adapt my scripts, etc).
>
> First look:
> Ppl using 0.25 will feel like in home. I haven't time to play with i.e. with
> HLS, but MythMusic Internet streams playback is HUGE thing for me !.
> I would say 0.26 is pretty safe for ppl don't liking learning new
> UI/features.
>
> Daily use:
> As I want to be sure system is stable, initially I run some stability tests:
> beside 20-30 daily family records I scheduled 36 test recordings rules
> triggering up to 16 (8HD+8SD) parallel recordings.
> After 2 weeks of tests I can say: 0.26 is far most stable release I had.
> I'm conservative type of user (preferring stability over functionality) so I
> must say I'm really impressed with 0.26 stability and performance (i.e. 16
> concurrent recordings on single SATA attached WD3TB is absolutely no
> problem; gives avg 45% load on CPU & 15-25% IOwait).
> Some time ago I post on users mailing list about high BE RSS consumption
> (1-1,3GB when recording 16 parallel streams.). This issue is solved by
> applying hunk4 from ticket11061.
> During month of operation I had single segfault on BE (also described on
> users ML), but absolutely no any other show stoppers - so in my case 0.26 is
> really best ver. ever.
>
> If anybody is not sure go or not with 0.26 - I strongly encourage You to go.
>
> For devs I want to say huge _TTHHAANNKK YYOOUU_ for Your incredible work !
>
> -br

My parents have had the same experience, and I did the entire upgrade
via SSH from across the country (combined backend/frontend and two
standalone frontends).

Ubuntu's mythdatabase package has an issue with it's post-install
script which requires manual tweaking of placing your database login
info in and then as far as I can tell fixing the access permissions
for remote frontends.

Sadly, it also sounds like the bug with recordings interrupting LiveTV
still isn't fixed, hopefully one of the dev's takes a serious look at
this issue soon.

I'm looking forward to the MythMusic changes, hopefully it will make
it usable for me. I just need to find a day to upgrade all my
systems...

-- 
Steve
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/User:Steveadeff
Before you ask, read the FAQ!
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
then search the Wiki, and this list,
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/
Mailinglist etiquette - http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Mailing_List_etiquette


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list