Difference between revisions of "Talk:Working QAM cable layout"

From MythTV Official Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Would this be better served through a categorization structure?)
 
(Would this be better served through a categorization structure?: - probably)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
If you are expecting to accrue a large list of these, it would be very easy to make each location an article, and put them in something like '''Category:Working QAM cable layout'''. Then, editors wouldn't be required maintain any sorting, and user's could quickly look find the area of the country they are interested in. --[[User:Gregturn|Gregturn]] 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 
If you are expecting to accrue a large list of these, it would be very easy to make each location an article, and put them in something like '''Category:Working QAM cable layout'''. Then, editors wouldn't be required maintain any sorting, and user's could quickly look find the area of the country they are interested in. --[[User:Gregturn|Gregturn]] 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Yeah, that's probably a good idea long-term, but I was gonna wait and see how big the pile got; we can always rediect to a category page, and I don't mind pulling this apart myself if it gets big enough to warrant. --[[User:Baylink|Baylink]] 17:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:19, 9 February 2006

Would this be better served through a categorization structure?

If you are expecting to accrue a large list of these, it would be very easy to make each location an article, and put them in something like Category:Working QAM cable layout. Then, editors wouldn't be required maintain any sorting, and user's could quickly look find the area of the country they are interested in. --Gregturn 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that's probably a good idea long-term, but I was gonna wait and see how big the pile got; we can always rediect to a category page, and I don't mind pulling this apart myself if it gets big enough to warrant. --Baylink 17:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)