Difference between revisions of "Talk:Working QAM cable layout"
From MythTV Official Wiki
(Would this be better served through a categorization structure?) |
(→Would this be better served through a categorization structure?: - probably) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If you are expecting to accrue a large list of these, it would be very easy to make each location an article, and put them in something like '''Category:Working QAM cable layout'''. Then, editors wouldn't be required maintain any sorting, and user's could quickly look find the area of the country they are interested in. --[[User:Gregturn|Gregturn]] 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | If you are expecting to accrue a large list of these, it would be very easy to make each location an article, and put them in something like '''Category:Working QAM cable layout'''. Then, editors wouldn't be required maintain any sorting, and user's could quickly look find the area of the country they are interested in. --[[User:Gregturn|Gregturn]] 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yeah, that's probably a good idea long-term, but I was gonna wait and see how big the pile got; we can always rediect to a category page, and I don't mind pulling this apart myself if it gets big enough to warrant. --[[User:Baylink|Baylink]] 17:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:19, 9 February 2006
Would this be better served through a categorization structure?
If you are expecting to accrue a large list of these, it would be very easy to make each location an article, and put them in something like Category:Working QAM cable layout. Then, editors wouldn't be required maintain any sorting, and user's could quickly look find the area of the country they are interested in. --Gregturn 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's probably a good idea long-term, but I was gonna wait and see how big the pile got; we can always rediect to a category page, and I don't mind pulling this apart myself if it gets big enough to warrant. --Baylink 17:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
